I Rewatched 2005’s House Of Wax And Still Think It Gets Too Much Hate

<

SPOILER WARNING: The following article gives away the entire story of 2005’s House of Wax so if you have not yet seen it and want to keep the film’s surprises preserved, proceed with caution before you read on.

I remember, in 2005, being just on the cusp of my ongoing obsession with the horror genre but having very little interest in seeing that year’s reimagining of 1953’s Vincent Price-led classic, House of Wax. This was mainly because I was not a fan of House of Wax cast member Paris Hilton, but the film’s pretty rude marketing strategy to promote the reality TV star’s death scene convinced me to give it a shot. I must say, I was pleasantly surprised.

Granted, I was about 12 years old when I first saw Jaume Collet-Serra’s directorial debut from Dark Castle Entertainment about a group of friends who discover a wax museum with a shocking secret behind its realistic sculptures. However, after watching it a second time as a 30-year-old, I still think it is one of the best horror movies from an era that saw the genre at a pretty low point and believe even our own House of Wax review judges its admittedly simple plot too harshly, ignoring its more entertaining and even unsettling elements. Well, I will proudly be the one to defend what I think is a horror movie remake that does not suck with the following points.

Brian Van Holt in House of Wax

(Image credit: Warner Bros.)

The Twin Theme Lends To Some Amusing Storytelling